ARCHIVED - LAST EDITED DEC 2025
Image credit: Whoosh
Exploring future options
For the past 12 months, Transpower, Aurora Energy and PowerNet have been working closely with Queenstown Lakes District Council and meeting with local organisations to understand just how much electricity will be needed and explore ways to secure Queenstown’s energy supply in the future.
Based on the scenarios, demand forecasting, extensive consultation with local businesses and organisations and taking into consideration the current grid configurations, we have developed a long list of options that had the potential to meet the region’s needs in the long term.
A team of experts from the three organisations met to evaluate the options based on criteria including additional capacity, additional resilience, risk, logistics, timeframes and cost to consumers.
These options take into account Queenstown’s unique landscape and features and incorporate future projections for electricity use and additional generation through home solar and batteries. All options are a combination of grid and other forms of electricity generation.
Long list of ideas
Using the scenarios, demand forecasting, our extensive consultation with local businesses and organisations, and taking into consideration the current grid configurations, our engineers and project team developed a long list of options that had the potential to meet the region’s needs in the future.
Exploring future options / considerations
Considerations
Non-network off-grid solutions
Non-network technologies such as battery storage, solar, and distributed generation form an important part of the solution to Queenstown’s growing electricity needs, although they are not a complete solution on their own and will require private investment. A diverse mix of options will be required to meet peak winter demand, especially when supply security is variable due to seasonal generation patterns.
Importantly, these technologies can also play a valuable role in deferring larger network infrastructure investments. By supporting peak demand and providing local resilience, especially during winter evenings, they can reduce the immediate pressure on the transmission network. This allows time to plan, design, and deliver major infrastructure projects more efficiently, while still meeting the region’s short- to medium-term energy needs.
While storage and distributed generation can support and enhance Queenstown’s energy resilience, they must be integrated into a broader, multi-layered strategy that includes larger-scale infrastructure investments from the transmission network.
To explore this potential, we engaged independent experts to assess how non-network, off-grid solutions could support Queenstown’s electricity network and defer the need for significant infrastructure upgrades.
The key findings of this analysis are as follows:
Suitable solar and battery capacity could help to manage peak demand while progressing the transmission line solution
The required battery storage could be either a large-scale centralised battery adjacent to a solar/PV farm, or many distributed batteries combined with household/business rooftop solar
It is possible to defer the need for a new line by 2-4 years if strong growth in solar and battery storage can be implemented over the next four years:
a) for example, a 2-4 year deferral would require around 6,000 households to install 5kWs of solar and around 25kWhs of battery storage per household
b) in addition, greater focus on peak demand management could offset the quantity of solar and battery storage required and/or create an additional 2-3 years of deferral, e.g. shifting the time of EV charging into the night or when solar is generating will slow peak demand growth
However, it is unlikely that a new transmission line into the Frankton/Queenstown region can be avoided altogether due to the scale of solar and battery storage required to deliver Queenstown’s growing energy requirements
Given the potential for high growth scenario to exceed the capacity limit within the next five years, it would be prudent to progress design and consenting of a new transmission line with urgency
Rooftop solar and battery storage will give other economic and resilience benefits for households and businesses in addition to the above transmission deferral benefits
Here is a copy of the independent report and the findings/recommendations.
Rewiring Aotearoa has looked at the options and given us their feedback
“Rewiring commends Energising Queenstown for seeking to understand the role that solar and batteries can play in lowering infrastructure costs for the community. The analysis done by GCNC and ANSA shows that solar and battery systems could realistically defer the transmission line for 4 years at least.
”Given we know solar and batteries already make economic sense for many homes and businesses today, we can therefore conclude that solar and battery systems could save the community millions from line deferment alone, and save millions more on energy bills. Whether these batteries are individual household installations or large scale batteries, or both, the evidence is now clear to us that distributed energy will be the lower cost option for the first few years at a minimum.
”Solar and batteries would also add substantial resilience to the community, which is valuable in itself. This gives the region a significant opportunity to better protect itself from events like AF8, and become a recognisable leader in energy system innovation.
“Installing this scale of solar and batteries over the next 5 years will require effort and planning, it will be helped by easy access to energy financing, and education materials for the community. The Queenstown Electrification Accelerator stands ready to donate time to building this plan and helping the region lead the world with low bills and high resilience."
Other transmission options
220kV options – discounted due to cost. Approximately $80-$100 million more expensive than 110kV options from Cromwell and Roxburgh
North Makarewa and Gore substation connections – discounted as it would be very expensive due to a longer line length to Queenstown. This option is also challenging from a network stability perspective
Victoria Flat substation – discounted due to cost. Very expensive distribution level upgrades would be required to connect to existing load and future load growth areas
Underground and submarine cable options. Approximately 8-10 times more than the cost of overhead, and cable life expectancy is lower than overhead lines. For the final solution, small sections of underground cable will be investigated to assist with constructability
Reconductoring the existing 110kV line from Cromwell – this is cheapest option however it would require power outages to all of Queenstown and is high risk from a construction safety perspective.
The short list, and being ready
To develop a short list, a team of experts from Transpower, Aurora Energy and PowerNet worked together to evaluate the options. They based the evaluation on a range of criteria including additional capacity, additional resilience, constructability, flexibility for future needs, timeframes and cost to consumers.
We will continue working with the Queenstown Electrification Accelerator programme to look at non-network solutions to defer the transmission infrastructure investment. A ‘no-regrets’ decision is to start the consenting, detailed design and construction planning for one of the four options below, given that overall project timeframes could be between 5-8 years. This includes a potential 3-year construction programme.
We need to be ready to hit the ground running with construction when needed, so we can keep delivering future-proofed electricity to the Queenstown area.
In July 2025 we put forward four options that take into account Queenstown’s unique landscape and features, and incorporate future projections for electricity use and additional generation through home solar and batteries.
Click on each option below to see the detail provided for consideration and feedback.
Options summary
Further details, including pros and cons, can be found by clicking on the buttons below
-
A new line between Cromwell and a new substation at Arrow Junction (single circuit, 110kV). A further upgrade will be required closer to 2045, if the maximum growth profile is realised, meaning overall costs will end up being higher than Option 2 and potentially Option 3.
Cost: approx. $122-$204 million
Estimated programme timeline: 5-7 years
Cost to customers*:
2032 - $330 to $550 per year
2050 - $244 to $408 per year
This option will increase capacity to the Queenstown region from 108MW to 240MW
This will provide additional capacity for:
~18,200 homes (5kW) 70%
~520 small and medium businesses (25kW) 10% and
~104 larger commercial loads. (500kW) 20%
*Based on midpoint population growth scenario and current Electricity Pricing Methodology
-
A new line between Cromwell and a new substation at Arrow Junction (double circuit, 110kV). This is similar to the existing line between Cromwell and Frankton. The current substation at Cromwell will need to be upgraded.
Cost: approx. $134-$225 million
Estimated programme timeline: 5-7 years
Cost to customers*:
2032 - $360 to $610 per year
2050 - $270 to $450 per year
This option will increase capacity to the Queenstown region from 108MW to 300MW
This will provide additional capacity for:
~26,600 homes (5kW) 70%
~760 small and medium businesses (25kW) 10% and
~152 larger commercial loads. (500kW) 20%
*Based on midpoint population growth scenario and current Electricity Pricing Methodology
-
A new line between Cromwell and a new substation at Arrow Junction (double circuit, 220kV). The current substation at Cromwell will need to be upgraded.
Cost: approx. $154-$255 million
Estimated programme timeline: 5-7 years
Cost to customers*:
2032 - $415 to $690 per year
2050 - $310 to $510 per year
This option will increase capacity to the Queenstown region from 108MW to 300MW (480MW if operated at 220kV)
This will provide additional capacity for:
~26,600 homes (5kW) 70%
~760 small and medium businesses (25kW) 10% and
~152 larger commercial loads. (500kW) 20%
*Based on midpoint population growth scenario and current Electricity Pricing Methodology
-
A new line between Roxburgh and a new substation at Jacks Point (double circuit, 110kV). The current substation at Roxburgh will need to be upgraded.
Cost: approx. $270-$460 million
Estimated programme timeline: 6-8 years
Cost to customers*:
2032 - $730 to $1,240 per year
2050 - $540 to $920 per year
This option will increase capacity to the Queenstown region from 108MW to 300MW
This will provide additional capacity for:
~26,600 homes (5kW) 70%
~760 small and medium businesses (25kW) 10% and
~152 larger commercial loads. (500kW) 20%
*Based on midpoint population growth scenario and current Electricity Pricing Methodology
Definitions: Single circuit – 3 wires on a span of power lines | Double circuit – 6 wires on a span of power lines | Power lines can be either single circuit or double circuit. The ‘line’ is the path the circuits take
The following chart shows how the options above lift the power capacity to Queenstown against the forecast growth and power load uplift due to decarbonisation. The dotted lines are the capacity uplift achieved by the potential options; solid lines are the growth forecast curves.
Next Steps
Consultation has now closed. Thank you to those who submitted. A summary of the submissions can be found here.
Transpower, Aurora Energy and PowerNet are reviewing the broad range of feedback provided and undertaking further analysis. We will provide an update early in 2026 on next steps.
Photo courtesy of Whoosh